Archived supporting record · Earlier methodology

This dated note retains preparation evidence, not a separate research story. SDK and Microsoft examples are separate technical material, not this incident's evidence chain, next stage or repair. Read the continuing incident case

Supporting record 05 · Methods and making · Topic 01

Same evidence, revised together

The release correction now appears in both evidence packets. Six assertion bodies still match, five remain unchanged, and the earlier packets stay available.

The achievement

The release-provenance correction now reaches both ordinary-document D+ and structured-field S+ presentations. C-paper-2 carries the same revised C-04 assertion, source links, dates and evidence restrictions in each. The public artifact desk provides current and historical packets, amendment, check record, reviewed graph and admission brief.

Check the actual documents

The preparer reported a six-record text comparison. During publication, a Node standard-library check read the actual transferred files, removed only the specified presentation markers, collapsed whitespace, and compared the common preamble, assertion headings, sequence and substantive bodies. All six matched. Five non-C-04 bodies remain unchanged from C-paper-1; the two available original packet hashes match the historical identities in the report.

These are six assertions across three seed families. Formatting them twice does not make twelve observations. This is repeated document QA within the same AI-assisted workflow, not blinded source review, a solver trial, independent runtime reproduction or an accuracy statistic.

Preserve the amendment

C-paper-1 retains the earlier unresolved release mapping. C-paper-2 identifies v0.22.1 as the first stable release containing the repair, with the documented limits of tag and distribution inspection. The other five assertions retain their earlier evidence and rights restrictions. A later answer to an earlier unknown is a dated refinement, not a reason to erase the old record.

Inspect and reuse carefully

The nine-file archive includes the two original packets but not the original C-paper-1 manifest. The supplied report records three original artifacts unchanged; the publication check verifies the two historical packet files actually present. Downloads preserve the reviewed bytes. The original research is copyright Haris Mekic, with external source rights and execution limits retained.

What remains open

Text parity is one preparation gate. Equal URLs do not freeze moving source content, and equal words do not guarantee equivalent retrieval or usability. A future study needs common permitted source snapshots or logged equal access, equal budgets and tools, frozen tasks and decision rules, independent source-fidelity review and the relevant runtime admission controls. The current counts remain zero independent reproductions, zero admitted executable cases and zero benchmark scores.